37
offered $10,000 to Christie, if he would kill Fung; that Christie, Zimmern and the accused remained together during
the day and discussed the possibilitity of killing Fung
either by shooting or by the use of potassium cyanide (the
accused expressing his preferanoe for shooting); thết
Christie purchased a hypodermis syringe and some potassá um cyanide with money fumished by the accused andhanded the
same to the accused; that the accused encouraged Christie
to carry out the proposal by the promise of his chauffeur's
assistance and also by alleging that being under 21 years
of age Christie was not liable to c apital punishment that Zimmern and the accused consulted one firm of Solicitors,
Messrs. Lo and Lo, to obtain, if they could, a confirmation
of this opinion of the law; and thet Zimmern and Chris tá e
on the invitation of the scous ed and with money provided
ay him obtained two other soliciters' opinions. Further
that on the 22nd March the accused told Zim.ern and Christi
that is bad experimented upon a chicken with the hypodermic
eyr nge and poison and that it had died, but that he had
damaged the syringe ; also that the request of the
accused Christie then purchased a second syringe on his
behalf, which he delivered to the accused. Furter that
on the 25th March before 5 a.n. the accused, who had given
Zimmern $50, at the same time gave Zimmern a further #10
to give to Christie. Finally, that on the evening of the
24th March Zimmern produced to the accused the receipt given by Hessrs. Lo andlo, Solicitors, for their professional
fee and that the accused destroyed this pap er ·
Zimmern and Christie have dis claimed any intention
of killing Fung and have said their object was to obtain
by fraud the money œ the accused.
The evidence was not in fact analysed by Counsel
before us in the above detail but I am satisfied that I
have set it out with sufficient accuracy for the resent
purpose.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.